DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008402937-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-12-09

000118321

Contested design: 008402937-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008402937-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Guojun Shenvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No.888. Xuwang Road, Yunlong Town, Yinzhou, Ningbo, China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Holder · RCD owner

Dilumen Electronics Limitedvia PDF extraction

Hong Kong (HK)

RM 1002 Easey Comm Bldg 253-261 Hennessy Rd, Wanchai, Hong Kong

Represented by

Manuel de Arpe Tejero

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

CYWER LED mirror light offered on Amazon

ASIN B07TSZP3TR · amazon.de · disclosed 2019-07-09

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested lamp lacked novelty and individual character, relying mainly on an Amazon listing for the CYWER LED mirror light disclosed before the filing date.
  • Holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon evidence as sufficient internet disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and treated the prior design as part of the prior art.
  • It found the designs shared the same essential rectangular, elongated lamp configuration and that minor differences in colour, material, and corner curvature did not alter the overall impression.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268