DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005173507-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-01-09

000118939

Contested design: 005173507-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0051735070001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Vitra Collections AGvia PDF extraction

Switzerland (CH)

Klünenfeldstr. 22, 4132 Muttenz, Switzerland

Holder · RCD owner

Jingzhen Liuvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 35, Group 3 village committee, GongAn village, DaWa town, ChangTu county, LiaoNing province, 112500 China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Eames Plastic Side Chair (DSW chair) in white tone

https://www.faz.net · Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung website, supported by Facebook and Twitter posts · disclosed 2016-06-15

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, arguing the contested chair reproduced its earlier Eames Plastic Side Chair disclosed online well before the filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not challenge the applicant's evidence or the alleged prior disclosure.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted the online article, Facebook posts, and Twitter extracts together as sufficient proof that the prior DSW chair had been disclosed before filing.
  • It found the prior and contested chairs identical, upheld the invalidity application under Article 25(1)(b) and Article 5(1)(b), and declared the design invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068