DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007022215-0025

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-01-09

000119079

Contested design: 007022215-0025

CDR

Outcome

Application inadmissible

The invalidity application is rejected as inadmissible, and the invalidity fee will not be refunded.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected as inadmissible. 2. The fee for the application for a declaration of invalidity will not be refunded.

CostsNo costs order

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Qiaoying Fangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No.27, Hudun Group, Huikou Community, Huikou Town, Susong County, Anqing City, Anhui Province 246000, China

Represented by

Asternery S.L

Holder · RCD owner

Dongyang Kewen Lighting Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

No.18, Xiyi Road, Lantian Community Small Commodity Industrial Park, Baiyun Street, Dongyang City, Jinhua City, Zhejiang Province, China

Represented by

Ipside

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

lamp shown in Amazon orders submitted as the invoked prior design

Amazon online retail portal order list · Amazon

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on Amazon order records and images of a lamp allegedly sold in the European Union.
  • The holder filed no observations recorded in the decision; the case was decided on the admissibility of the applicant's evidence.
  • The Division found the application did not clearly identify and represent the earlier design and that the later-submitted clearer image did not match the original evidence and lacked proof of existence.
  • Because the deficiency was not remedied within the time limit, the application was rejected as inadmissible and the invalidity fee was not refunded.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000128736

vs Senjia (Dongguan)Electronic Technology Co., LTD

2025-07-11Art 25(1)(b)267
000125015

vs Honglan YIN

2025-02-10Art 25(1)(b)267
000124516

vs YUYAO HILITE ELECTRIC CO.,LTD

2024-12-19Art 25(1)(b)267
000121816

vs AMV Technology s.r.o.

2024-07-12Art 25(1)(b)267
000121836

vs AMV Technology s.r.o.

2024-07-12Art 25(1)(b)267
000121120

vs DELTA LIGHT NV

2024-06-18Art 25(1)(b)267
000121119

vs DELTA LIGHT NV

2024-06-13Art 25(1)(b)267
000120900

vs DELTA LIGHT NV

2024-06-10Art 25(1)(b)267