DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008566822-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-07-12

000121816

Contested design: 008566822-0002

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected and the applicant must bear the holder's costs, fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 008566822-0002 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder's costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Smart View s.r.o.via PDF extraction

Czechia (CZ)

Nivy 313, 76502 Otrokovice, Czech Republic

Holder · RCD owner

AMV Technology s.r.o.

Czechia (CZ)

Masarykovo náměstí 210, 76361 Napajedla Czech Republic

Represented by

Tomas Pavlica

Prior art cited (2)

Prior use⚠ rejected as evidence

bar light / matrix light

LL/60

Prior use⚠ rejected as evidence

bar light / matrix light

LL/120

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 25(1)(f)Article 25(3)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested lighting design lacked novelty and individual character over its earlier LL/60 and LL/120 bar lights and also relied on copyright in the technical drawings.
  • The holder requested rejection of the invalidity application and maintenance of the contested design in the Register.
  • The Division found the catalogue, drawings, emails, invoices, trade-fair materials, and Wayback Machine printouts insufficient to prove prior disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • The Division also found the Article 25(1)(f) claim unsubstantiated because the evidence showed the applicant was only a licensee, not the copyright owner entitled to enforce the work.
  • The application was rejected in full and the applicant was ordered to pay EUR 400 in representation costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000121836

vs AMV Technology s.r.o.

2024-07-12Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f)269
000127916

vs Volvo Car Corporation

2026-02-11Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f)267
000128736

vs Senjia (Dongguan)Electronic Technology Co., LTD

2025-07-11Art 25(1)(b)267
000125015

vs Honglan YIN

2025-02-10Art 25(1)(b)267
000124516

vs YUYAO HILITE ELECTRIC CO.,LTD

2024-12-19Art 25(1)(b)267
000121120

vs DELTA LIGHT NV

2024-06-18Art 25(1)(b)267
000121119

vs DELTA LIGHT NV

2024-06-13Art 25(1)(b)267
000120900

vs DELTA LIGHT NV

2024-06-10Art 25(1)(b)267