DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008944656-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-02-11

000127916

Contested design: 008944656-0002

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder's fixed costs of EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered EU design No 008944656-0002 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Petru Dumitrașcuvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Târgu Ocna, Romania

Represented by

Raul Sorin Fântână

Holder · RCD owner

Volvo Car Corporation

Sweden (SE)

Gothenburg, Sweden

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

Headlights for vehicles

EU design registration No 004379253-0001 · EU Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2017-10-10

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 4(2)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7Article 25(1)(d)Article 25(1)(f)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, invisible component-part status, conflict with an earlier design, and unauthorised use of a copyright-protected work based mainly on earlier design No 004379253-0001.
  • The holder argued the contested headlight design was new and produced a different overall impression, that abstract movement concepts are not design rights, and that the copyright claim was unsubstantiated.
  • The Division found Article 4(2) EUDR inapplicable, accepted disclosure of the earlier design, but held the compared designs were not identical and Article 25(1)(d) could not apply because the earlier design had been published before the contested filing date.
  • The Division also rejected the copyright ground as unsubstantiated for lack of identified national law and supporting particulars, so the invalidity application was rejected in full.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberChiara BORACE
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000116207

vs   Grzegorz CHUDY - Z. P-H-U. „FORMES TOYS" mgr inż. Grzegorz Chudy

2022-05-25Art 25(1)(d), Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f)2611
000125398

vs Nan Zheng

2024-08-28Art 25(1)(d), Art 25(1)(b)269
000130205

vs MHS IMPORT EXPORT Sp. z o.o.

2026-05-08Art 25(1)(f)267
000119599

vs XAL GmbH

2026-04-15Art 25(1)(b)267
000119620

vs XAL GmbH

2026-04-15Art 25(1)(b)267
000119619

vs XAL GmbH

2026-04-15Art 25(1)(b)267
000131624

vs NOVOWISE LTD

2026-03-27Art 25(1)(b)267
000130242

vs DMUSEUM Inc.

2026-03-05Art 25(1)(b)267