DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015049756-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-05-08

000130205

Contested design: 015049756-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder's fixed costs of EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered EU design No 0150497560001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Iluminivia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Warszawa, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

MHS Import Export Sp. z o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Trzebownisko, Poland

Represented by

Izabela Szychulska-Hawranek

Prior art cited (1)

OtherAnnex 1⚠ rejected as evidence

drawing of the 'Karafa' glass lantern design

Karafa · applicant's Annex 1 drawing and Annex 5 statement

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(f)Article 25(3)

Argument summary

  • The applicant claimed the contested design unlawfully used its copyrighted 'Karafa' lantern work under Article 25(1)(f), relying on a January 2024 drawing, a later copyright transfer, and Polish copyright materials.
  • The holder disputed the timing and completeness of 'Karafa', argued its own candle design had been created earlier, and submitted contracts, transfer documents, and supplier materials to show independent creation.
  • The Invalidity Division found both parties' timing evidence inconclusive, but held the applicant had not shown with sufficient certainty that 'Karafa' existed in a protectable, accessible form before the filing date or could have been copied.
  • The application was rejected because the evidence did not establish unauthorised use of the invoked copyrighted work; costs were awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127916

vs Volvo Car Corporation

2026-02-11Art 25(1)(f)267
000116207

vs   Grzegorz CHUDY - Z. P-H-U. „FORMES TOYS" mgr inż. Grzegorz Chudy

2022-05-25Art 25(1)(f)267
000119599

vs XAL GmbH

2026-04-15265
000119619

vs XAL GmbH

2026-04-15265
000119620

vs XAL GmbH

2026-04-15265
000131624

vs NOVOWISE LTD

2026-03-27265
000128957

vs Signify Holding B.V.

2026-03-09265
000128635

vs Signify Holding B.V.

2026-03-06265