DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008265029-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-01-10

000117855

Contested design: 008265029-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008265029-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

incubado GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Werner-von-Siemens-Str. 3-7, 25479 Ellerau, Germany

Represented by

Lexea Rechtsanwälte

Holder · RCD owner

Leqing Huang

China (CN)

Room 1403, Duty Free Business Building, No. 6, Fuhua 1st Road, Futian District, Shenzhen, China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Bicycle Pizza Cutter offered on Amazon

https://www.amazon.de; ASIN B07631XJXX · Amazon.de · disclosed 2017-10-19

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested bicycle-shaped pizza cutter lacked novelty and individual character because the same product had been sold on Amazon since 19 October 2017.
  • Holder replied that the Amazon disclosure came from the same holder and filed Seller Central and business-license evidence to show the earlier product was its own disclosure.
  • The Division held the Amazon listing was a valid internet disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and fell outside the 12-month grace period in Article 7(2) CDR.
  • Comparing the bicycle-shaped pizza cutters, the Division found no different overall impression on the informed user, so the contested design lacked individual character.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131632

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000129741

vs 2W ORGANIC

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131788

vs Liu Xiaoxia

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131628

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131704

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131745

vs Huan Wang

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000130924

vs SOHAI HOUSEWARES CO.,LTD.

2026-04-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131546

vs Foshan Changyuansheng Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078