DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007872254-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-01-11

000119068

Contested design: 007872254-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 007872254-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Kaiyan Fanvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 504 Building 12 Qinqin Jiayuan Jinping Street, Fenghua, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China

Represented by

Katerina Grišina

Holder · RCD owner

Chi Tat Fu

United Kingdom (GB)

5 The Meadows, West Ella East Riding of Yorkshire HU10 7RW, United Kingdom

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Huanuo monitor stand with 3 height-adjustable screen raiser

ASIN B07L86BK3F · Amazon.de · disclosed 2018-07-10

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on an Amazon.de listing showing the Huanuo monitor stand disclosed from 10 July 2018 before the RCD filing date.
  • Holder filed no observations and did not contest disclosure, designer freedom, or the comparison with the earlier monitor stand.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listing as sufficient internet disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and considered the relevant sector to be monitor stands with at least average designer freedom.
  • Because the shared structural features dominated and the differences were minor, the designs created the same overall impression; the RCD lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068