DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009067853-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-01-13

000119242

Contested design: 009067853-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 009067853-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Chengdu Jiechen Technology Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

A-5-1, No. 19, Zhenxing West 1st Road, Jinniu High-tech Industrial Park, Chengdu, 610036, China

Represented by

Tong Yang SLU

Holder · RCD owner

Chongqingzhuozhuoqihua Technology CO., Ltd

China (CN)

15-6, Building 5, No. 49, Yongsheng Road, Xiyong Street, High-tech Zone, Chongqing, 400000, China

Represented by

Brimondo AB

Prior art cited (1)

National design

ergonomic pillow

CN 305090559 S · CNIPA · disclosed 2019-04-02

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested ergonomic pillow lacked novelty and individual character over earlier Chinese design CN 305090559 S published before the filing date.
  • The holder was invited to file observations on the invalidity application but submitted no reply.
  • The Division accepted the CNIPA extract as proof of prior disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and found broad designer freedom for ergonomic pillows.
  • It held the shared shape and proportions dominated the overall impression, while colour and extra bumps were minor differences, so the contested design lacked individual character.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.09

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068