DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008887723-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-01-25

000118659

Contested design: 008887723-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected and the applicant must bear the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 008887723-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

SC Ocean Fish SRLvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

DN 2 KM 14, Com. Afumati Nr. 72, Romania

Represented by

Cabinet Ani Fuciu SRL

Anișoara Fuciu

Holder · RCD owner

S.C. Negro 2000 SRLvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

B-dul Metalurgiei, nr. 136, sector 4, Bucuresti, Romania

Represented by

Claudiu Feraru

Prior art cited (3)

Registered RCD

food bag

RCD No 008568935-0001 · EUIPO Community Designs Register · disclosed 2021-06-10

Registered RCD

food bag

RCD No 008568935-0002 · EUIPO Community Designs Register · disclosed 2021-06-10

Trade mark

figurative mark in the form of a food bag for fish and seafood products

EUTM No 18 358 300 · EUIPO Trade Mark Register · disclosed 2021-06-30

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(d)Article 25(1)(e)Article 9(2)(a)Article 9(2)(b)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(d) and (e) based on two earlier RCDs and an earlier EUTM for food-bag packaging allegedly sharing the same shape and colour placement.
  • The holder filed no observations and left the invalidity application undefended.
  • The Division held Article 25(1)(d) did not apply because the cited earlier RCDs had been published before, not after, the contested design’s filing date.
  • Under Article 25(1)(e), the earlier mark and the sign used in the contested design were visually, aurally and conceptually dissimilar, so there was no prohibited use or likelihood of confusion.
  • The application was rejected in full and the applicant was ordered to pay EUR 400 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000118641

vs S.C. NEGRO 2000 SRL

2023-01-25Art 25(1)(e), Art 25(1)(d)099
000118642

vs S.C. NEGRO 2000 SRL

2023-01-25Art 25(1)(e), Art 25(1)(d)099
000118639

vs S.C. NEGRO 2000 SRL

2023-01-25Art 25(1)(e), Art 25(1)(d)099
000118640

vs S.C. NEGRO 2000 SRL

2023-01-16Art 25(1)(e), Art 25(1)(d)099
000126496

vs Jiangmen Xinhui Zhenghua Ironware Co., Ltd.

2025-03-07Art 25(1)(d)097
000114621

vs SELEX TRADING

2022-08-16Art 25(1)(e)097
000114705

vs Albert Ungrad

2022-03-17Art 25(1)(d)097
000114521

vs CRIS-TIM COMPANIE DE FAMILIE SRL

2021-09-08Art 25(1)(e)097