DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008758395-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-01-31

000118302

Contested design: 008758395-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested Community design No 008758395-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 008758395-0001 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Nicola Schmitzvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Am Gießenbach 10, 82496 Oberau, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

co4concept OÜ

EE

A. Haava 22-2, 50409 Tartu, Estland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD3

baby swing seat offered for sale on Etsy

https://www.etsy.com/de/listing/1183990105/beige-grau-baumwolle-babyschaukel-stoff?ga_order=most_relevant&ga_search_type=all&ga_view_type=gallery&ga_search_query=babyschaukel&ref=sc_gallery-2-6&plkey=a89974b448434c61e98007aa328eaf493be48b78%3A1183990105 · Etsy

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying in particular on prior disclosure D3.
  • The holder argued the contested design was new and had individual character because the cited earlier designs created a different overall impression.
  • The Division accepted D3 as an internet disclosure before the filing date and found the designer's freedom at least average for baby swing seats.
  • It held the similarities with D3 outweighed the listed differences, so the contested design produced the same overall impression and lacked individual character.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218