DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008699631-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-02-08

000118197

Contested design: 008699631-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0086996310001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Jialin Fangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 606, Building 6, Lianyiyuan, Donghu Road, Xinxingxingdong Community, Rongcheng District, Jieyang, Guangdong, China

Represented by

CO LA Consulting

Michele Carella

Holder · RCD owner

Yong Changvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Chenzhuang East Group, Yingliu Village, Banqiao Town, Yicheng District, Zhumadian City (Henan province), China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

ADEKEKM Chair Leg Caps

https://www.amazon.de; ASIN B08YDCTCJP · Amazon.de · disclosed 2021-06-21

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based mainly on an earlier Amazon.de disclosure of chair leg caps before the filing date.
  • The holder argued the web disclosure concerned transparent caps, fell within the Article 7(2) grace period, was not reasonably knowable in the EU, and that technical constraints and a crowded design corpus supported a different impression.
  • The Division found the Amazon listing sufficiently proved disclosure before filing, rejected the grace-period defence for lack of evidence linking the seller to the holder, and found no proven market saturation limiting the comparison.
  • Comparing the designs, the Division held their shared cup shape, brown body, bottom holes and cork-like pad outweighed minor differences, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberAlfonso CID GONZALEZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068