DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003466663-0010

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-02-10

000119461

Contested design: 003466663-0010

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0034666630010 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Zeng Xianzhongvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Xiyan Town, Chengbu Miao Autonomous County, Shaoyang City, Hunan Province 422000, China

Holder · RCD owner

ShenZhen ZhuoQiong Technology Co.,Ltd.

China (CN)

RM3088, SEG Plaza, Huaqiang North Street, Futian District, Shenzhen, China

Represented by

José Izquierdo Faces

Prior art cited (1)

National design

LED lighting device

CN303901277S (application No 201630311115.2) · China · disclosed 2016-10-26

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on earlier Chinese design CN303901277S disclosed before the contested filing date.
  • The applicant argued the designs shared the same casing, rear details and support structure, and that differences in LED count and arrangement were minor.
  • The holder filed no observations, so the evidence of disclosure was unrebutted and the prior design was treated as made available to the public under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • The Division found the similarities dominated the overall impression, the differences were minor, and declared the contested design invalid with costs against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberIneta GALUBICKE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268