DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005490596-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-02-15

000117893

Contested design: 005490596-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld, the contested Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 005490596-0003 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

WMK Trading GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Waltrup 16, 48341 Altenberge, Deutschland

Represented by

Kathrin Herking

Holder · RCD owner

EveMotion GmbH

Germany (DE)

Marzahner Chaussee 213, 12681 Berlin, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD2

Pavillon

ASIN B01N35FCCI · Amazon.de · disclosed 2016-03-07

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying in particular on earlier design D2 disclosed on Amazon on 7 March 2016.
  • The holder argued the contested design remained new and individual, disclosure of the earlier designs was unproven, the field was crowded, and Berlin court rulings favored validity.
  • The Division accepted D2 as publicly disclosed, found broad designer freedom for gazebos, and held the lighting feature did not alter the overall impression against the many shared features.
  • The contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b), so the invalidity application was granted and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124780

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258