DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008435754-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-03-14

000117838

Contested design: 008435754-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld; Registered Community design No 008435754-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder is ordered to pay costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 008435754-0001 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

DesignNest B.V.via PDF extraction

Netherlands (NL)

Keulschevaart 19, 3621 MX Breukelen, Niederlande

Represented by

Ab Ovo Patents B.V.

Holder · RCD owner

Spyra GmbH

Germany (DE)

Tengstr. 34, 80796 München, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

water gun shown in the YouTube video "Spyra One | Next Level of Water Gun Design | Now LIVE on Kickstarter! (July 2018)"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUcW1iZ8x_k · YouTube · disclosed 2018-07-30

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying mainly on D1, a water-gun design disclosed on YouTube before the filing date.
  • Holder denied valid disclosure and argued functional constraints limited design freedom; it maintained the contested design created a different overall impression and requested rejection.
  • The Division accepted the YouTube screenshots as sufficient evidence that D1 was publicly disclosed on 2018-07-30 and found the holder had not rebutted public accessibility.
  • With at least average design freedom, the Division found both designs gave the same overall impression of a massive, angular, nearly rectangular water gun and declared the RCD invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218