DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008019996-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-03-14

000117914

Contested design: 008019996-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld, the contested Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 008019996-0001 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

DesignNest B.V.via PDF extraction

Netherlands (NL)

Keulschevaart 19, 3621 MX Breukelen, Niederlande

Represented by

Ab Ovo Patents B.V.

Holder · RCD owner

Spyra GmbH

Germany (DE)

Tengstr. 34, 80796 München, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

Spyra One water gun design shown in a YouTube promotional video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUcW1iZ8x_k · YouTube · disclosed 2018-07-30

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested water-gun design lacked novelty and individual character over earlier disclosures, including D1 shown by the holder on YouTube before filing.
  • The holder disputed disclosure and argued functional constraints and design differences created a different overall impression; it also requested an oral hearing if the application were upheld.
  • The Division found the YouTube screenshots proved D1 was publicly disclosed on 30 July 2018 and that the holder had not rebutted that disclosure.
  • Comparing D1 with the contested design, the Division found the same overall impression for the informed user and declared the design invalid for lack of individual character.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218