DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008435754-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-03-14

000117915

Contested design: 008435754-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld; Registered Community design No. 008435754-0002 is declared invalid; the holder must bear the costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 008435754-0002 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

DesignNest B.V.via PDF extraction

Netherlands (NL)

Keulschevaart 19, 3621 MX Breukelen, Niederlande

Represented by

Ab Ovo Patents B.V.

Holder · RCD owner

Spyra GmbH

Germany (DE)

Tengstr. 34, 80796 München, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

water gun shown in the YouTube video "Spyra One | Next Level of Water Gun Design | Now LIVE on Kickstarter! (July 2018)"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUcW1iZ8x_k · YouTube · disclosed 2018-07-30

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying mainly on D1, a YouTube disclosure of an earlier Spyra water gun shown on 30 July 2018.
  • The holder denied effective disclosure and argued the contested design differed in proportions, contours, surface treatment, and overall impression, also invoking functional constraints on water-gun design.
  • The Division held the YouTube screenshots sufficiently proved public disclosure under Article 7 and found the holder had not rebutted that presumption.
  • Comparing D1 with the contested design, the Division found the same overall impression of a massive, angular, nearly rectangular water gun and concluded the contested RCD lacked individual character.
  • The invalidity application was upheld in full, the contested RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218