DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008648935-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-03-21

000119682

Contested design: 008648935-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008648935-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

ALM Manufacturing Limitedvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

Grimbald Crag Close, St James Business Park, Knaresborough, North Yorkshire HG5 8PJ, United Kingdom

Represented by

Plasseraud IP

Holder · RCD owner

Yiwu Shunge Trading Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Room 305, 3rd Floor, Unit 3, Bldg. 40, Pingchou Second Dist., Jiangdong St., Yiwu, Zhejiang 322000, China

Represented by

Cleanthous & Co LLC

Eleni Loizidou Ioannides

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosure

ALM BQ026 plastic blades

http://almmanufacturing.com · Internet Archive Wayback Machine · disclosed 2019-04-24

Web disclosure

Alm Clip On Blades (BQ026)

ASIN B002SHR4RA · www.amazon.co.uk · disclosed 2007-05-01

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested chaffcutter blade design lacked novelty and individual character because identical or very similar blades had long been sold online and through distributors.
  • The holder filed no observations and left the applicant's evidence and arguments unrebutted.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon and Wayback Machine evidence as prior internet disclosures and found the designer's freedom below average for this product.
  • It held that the prior and contested blades created the same overall impression, so the design lacked individual character and had to be invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberIneta GALUBICKE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

15.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132204

vs Baofeng LIU

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000132185

vs Baofeng LIU

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000132064

vs Han Sheng

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131827

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131826

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131787

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131088

vs ZhiAo Zhou

2026-03-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000129841

vs Suzhou Kingbow Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd

2026-01-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158