DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008676001-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-03-22

000119718

Contested design: 008676001-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0086760010001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

ALM Manufacturing Limitedvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

Grimbald Crag Close, St James Business Park, Knaresborough, North Yorkshire HG5 8PJ, United Kingdom

Represented by

Plasseraud IP

Holder · RCD owner

Yiwu Shunge Trading Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Room 305, 3rd Floor, Unit 3, Bldg. 40, Pingchou Second Dist., Jiangdong St., Yiwu, Zhejiang 322000, China

Represented by

Cleanthous & Co LLC

Eleni Loizidou Ioannides

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

ALM FE220 / ALM Plastic Trimmer Blades FE220 blade

http://almmanufacturing.com; ASIN B08Y5WLTFJ · Wayback Machine capture of almmanufacturing.com and amazon.co.uk · disclosed 2019-10-03

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested chaffcutter blade lacked novelty and individual character because identical or very similar blades had already been sold and shown online before filing.
  • The applicant relied on Wayback Machine captures from its website and Amazon printouts for ALM FE220 blades; the holder filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted the internet disclosures under Article 7(1) CDR and found the prior and contested blades shared the same main shape, aperture, bevelled edges, and overall appearance.
  • The contested design produced no different overall impression on the informed user, so it lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberIneta GALUBICKE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

15.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132204

vs Baofeng LIU

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000132185

vs Baofeng LIU

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000132064

vs Han Sheng

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131827

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131826

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131787

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131088

vs ZhiAo Zhou

2026-03-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000129841

vs Suzhou Kingbow Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd

2026-01-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158