DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008105753-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-04-04

000119681

Contested design: 008105753-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008105753-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Alexander Hulmevia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

Apartment 203, Margerie Court, 5 Esker Place, London, E2 9FH United Kingdom

Holder · RCD owner

Qun Lv

China (CN)

Unit 1, Bldg. 57, Xixigu Vil., Jiangdong St., Yiwu,, Jinhua, Zhejiang China

Represented by

Sławomir Krzysztof Nowicki

Prior art cited (1)

National design

holders, stands and supports for electronic equipment

UK national design registration No 6093533 · UK Designs Bulletin

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over UK national design registration No 6093533 for a mobile phone stand.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the UK design had been disclosed before the contested filing date and that the designer enjoyed a high degree of freedom.
  • It concluded that the similar overall shape and arm configuration outweighed minor differences, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

14.99

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130850

vs Michael AMARA

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131224

vs Shenzhen Ruixin Fengshuo Electronic Co., Ltd

2026-03-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130970

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131064

vs Jinfeng Min

2026-02-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130524

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000129861

vs Liu yanqiong

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130564

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130565

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148