DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008658694-0007

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-04-25

000117596

Contested design: 008658694-0007

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 350 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008658694-0007 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 350.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Zbigniew Szołtysvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Wybickiego 35F, 40-756 Katowice Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Krzysztof Kułakowskivia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Gutki 4, 37-450 Nisko Poland

Represented by

Kancelaria Patentowa Aleksandra Marcińska

Aleksandra Marcińska

Prior art cited (3)

Web disclosure

identical composite furniture offered for purchase online

Amazon.de · Amazon.de · disclosed 2017-04-14

Other

identical composite furniture shown at a fair

G2A Arena, Jasionka near Rzeszów, Poland · G2A Arena fair · disclosed 2019-04-06

Registered RCD

wooden barrel rack/cupboard with rectangular front opening and single shelf

Community design No 008589261-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin / DesignView · disclosed 2021-07-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 5(2)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicants sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on Amazon and fair disclosures and earlier RCD No 008589261-0001.
  • Holder argued the design was new and individually distinctive, the earlier RCD had been surrendered, and any similarities were insufficient to make the designs identical.
  • The Division found publication of RCD No 008589261-0001 before 21/08/2021 proved disclosure under Article 7 CDR, regardless of its later surrender.
  • Comparing the designs directly, the Division held they differed only in immaterial wood colour variation, so the contested design lacked novelty and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberIneta GALUBICKE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068