DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008868517-0005

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-04-28

000120060

Contested design: 008868517-0005

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008868517-0005 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

BB Coffee Company GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Kapellenstr. 9, 82008 Unterhaching, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Chuang-Kang Machinery Technology Co., Ltd

Taiwan (TW)

NO. 128, Yazhou Rd.,Tucheng Dist, New Taipei City 236042 Taiwan

Represented by

Murgitroyd & Company

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnex LSG 4

Instagram post showing three sizes of coffee grinders

https://www.instagram.com/p/CDTCu7qBpu4/?hl=de · Instagram account @Izpresso_tw · disclosed 2020-12-09

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested coffee grinder lacked novelty and individual character in light of earlier disclosures, including an Instagram post dated 9 December 2020.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not dispute the applicant's disclosure evidence.
  • The Division accepted Annex LSG 4 as prior public disclosure, found average designer freedom, and considered the contested and prior grinders to create the same overall impression.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131632

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000129741

vs 2W ORGANIC

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131788

vs Liu Xiaoxia

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131628

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131704

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131745

vs Huan Wang

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000130924

vs SOHAI HOUSEWARES CO.,LTD.

2026-04-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131546

vs Foshan Changyuansheng Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078