DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009045305-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-05-05

000119858

Contested design: 009045305-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0090453050001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Symetricus sp. z o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Plac Wolności 4, 40078 Katowice, Poland

Represented by

Monika Małgorzata Żuraw

Holder · RCD owner

’Трейдон Бг’ Оодvia PDF extraction

Bulgaria (BG)

бул. ‘Александър Малинов’ № 87, ап. 19, 1712 София Bulgaria

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureAnnex 8

Facebook post showing and advertising the 'Aroma King 700' electronic cigarette

Aroma King Facebook profile · disclosed 2021-11-08

Web disclosureAnnex 8

Facebook post showing and advertising the 'Aroma King 700' electronic cigarette

Aroma King Facebook profile · disclosed 2021-09-21

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over its earlier Aroma King 700 electronic cigarette disclosed before the filing date.
  • The holder was invited to respond but filed no observations or evidence contesting disclosure or the merits.
  • The Division accepted the Facebook posts as prior public disclosure and found broad designer freedom apart from the basic mouthpiece, body, and bottom structure.
  • Because the designs created the same overall impression on the informed user, the contested design lacked individual character and was declared invalid with costs against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

27.07

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130847

vs Ying CAO

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000125137

vs Shenzhen Olit Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-12-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000127919

vs Benxi Fenghe Lighter Co., Ltd

2025-05-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000124395

vs Xin Lu

2025-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000126756

vs SHENZHEN KAIWEILI DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2024-12-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000126655

vs Feoba Tech Limited

2024-12-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000126656

vs Feoba Tech Limited

2024-12-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000126597

vs Feoba Tech Limited

2024-12-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278