DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008706162-0008

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-05-11

000118720

Contested design: 008706162-0008

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008706162-0008 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

S. Tous, S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Carretera de Vic, El Guix, 3, 08243 Manresa (Barcelona), Spain

Represented by

Baylos

Holder · RCD owner

Van Phuong Tranvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Legionów 10B, 05-552 Mroków, Poland

Represented by

Maciej Bocheński

Prior art cited (2)

Trade mark

figurative teddy bear mark

EUTM No 14 654 289 · EUIPO eSearch database · disclosed 2015-10-07

Trade mark

figurative teddy bear mark

EUTM No 8 127 144 · EUIPO eSearch database

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(e)Article 9(2)(c)Article 8(5)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity under Articles 25(1)(b), 25(1)(d) and 25(1)(e) CDR, arguing the contested logo used its reputed TOUS bear mark and unfairly exploited its reputation.
  • The holder argued the contested design differed from the applicant's marks and that most evidence related to the TOUS word mark rather than the invoked figurative marks.
  • The Division found EUTM No 14 654 289 had reputation at least in Spain for jewellery, the bear signs were sufficiently similar, and consumers would establish a link for identical goods.
  • Use of the contested sign without due cause would take unfair advantage of the earlier mark's repute, so the application was upheld and the other invalidity grounds were not examined.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberIneta GALUBICKE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

32.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129181

vs VAN PHUONG TRAN

2025-10-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000123377

vs Francesco Paolo Intini

2024-05-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000123376

vs Francesco Paolo Intini

2024-05-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000118797

vs VAN PHUONG TRAN

2023-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000118777

vs VAN PHUONG TRAN

2023-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000118577

vs aqotec Holding GmbH

2023-03-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000105120

vs ETI GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI

2023-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000105139

vs ETI GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI

2023-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328