DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008706162-0005

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-05-11

000118777

Contested design: 008706162-0005

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008706162-0005 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

S. Tous, S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Carretera de Vic, El Guix, 3, 08243 Manresa (Barcelona), Spain

Represented by

Baylos

Holder · RCD owner

Van Phuong Tranvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Legionów 10B, 05-552 Mroków, Poland

Represented by

Maciej Bocheński

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(e)Article 9(2)(c)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity based mainly on Article 25(1)(e) CDR, arguing the contested teddy-bear logo exploited the reputation of its earlier TOUS bear EU trade marks.
  • Holder argued the signs were different and most evidence related to the word mark TOUS rather than the figurative bear marks, so the application should be rejected.
  • The Division found the earlier figurative mark had proven reputation at least in Spain for jewellery, and that consumers would make a link with the bear sign used in the contested design.
  • Because use of the sign would likely take unfair advantage of the earlier mark’s reputation without due cause, the applicant could prohibit that use under Article 25(1)(e) CDR.
  • The application was upheld in full, the contested design was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to bear costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberIneta GALUBICKE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

32.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129181

vs VAN PHUONG TRAN

2025-10-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000123377

vs Francesco Paolo Intini

2024-05-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000123376

vs Francesco Paolo Intini

2024-05-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000118797

vs VAN PHUONG TRAN

2023-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000118720

vs VAN PHUONG TRAN

2023-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000118577

vs aqotec Holding GmbH

2023-03-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000105120

vs ETI GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI

2023-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000105139

vs ETI GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI

2023-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328