DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008570188-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-06-05

000120540

Contested design: 008570188-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008570188-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Nina-Maria Drenkowvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Marschnerstraße 32, 22081 Hamburg, Germany

Represented by

Lexea Rechtsanwälte

Holder · RCD owner

Henan Nanhua Qianmu Biotechnology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

No. 8503a-8503b, 5F, Suoke Yellow River Jian'gong Bldg., No. 66 Huayuan N. Rd., Jinshui Dist., Zhengzhou City, Henan Province, China

Represented by

Qiang Zhou

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureannex 1

Amazon offer for Dwance pampas grass decorative fake flower pampa grass

ASIN B08RDHXZ78 · amazon.de · disclosed 2020-10-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(a)Article 3(a)Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the design showed a natural pampas grass rather than a protectable industrial product and also lacked novelty and individual character.
  • The applicant relied on an Amazon listing for artificial pampas grass available since 28 October 2020; the holder filed no observations.
  • The Division rejected the Article 3(a) objection because the registration covered artificial plants, not a living organism.
  • The Division found the Amazon disclosure proven and concluded the contested design produced the same overall impression, so it lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

11.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000117713

vs Jessica Peil

2022-07-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a)1110
000130246

vs Giuliana FERRAROTTI

2026-05-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000131904

vs Lang Huang

2026-04-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000130401

vs KROKIDO GROUP s.r.o.

2025-12-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(a)118
000126975

vs Anna Krystyniak

2025-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000126957

vs Anna Krystyniak

2025-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000126956

vs Anna Krystyniak

2025-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000126958

vs Anna Krystyniak

2025-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118