DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015032175-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-12-10

000130401

Contested design: 015032175-0003

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 720.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 0150321750003 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Enriqueta Vicente-Torta Balarivia PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Barcelona, Spain

Represented by

Jordi Güell Serra

Holder · RCD owner

Krokido Group s.r.o.via PDF extraction

Czechia (CZ)

Nový Bor, Czechia

Represented by

Kamil Kolátor

Prior art cited (4)

Prior useExhibits 1-4

Email with a picture of a prior figurine design, plus supporting commercial register extract, manufacturer declaration and invoices.

email and invoices

Web disclosureExhibit 5

Instagram extract containing a picture of the applicant's prior figurine design.

Instagram · Instagram · disclosed 2020-07-11

Web disclosureExhibit 6

Instagram extract containing a picture of the applicant's prior figurine design.

Instagram · Instagram · disclosed 2021-09-01

Web disclosureExhibit 7

Instagram extract containing a picture of the applicant's prior figurine design.

Instagram · Instagram · disclosed 2022-02-12

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(a)Article 3(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the registered views were materially inconsistent and did not depict a single clear product under Article 3(1) EUDR.
  • In the alternative, the applicant claimed the figurine lacked individual character over its earlier figurine disclosures, including Instagram posts and prior commercial dealings.
  • The holder was invited to respond but filed no observations.
  • The Invalidity Division found view 3.1 clearly contradicted views 3.2 to 3.4, so the representation lacked the clarity, certainty and precision required for a unitary design.
  • The application was upheld under Article 25(1)(a) EUDR, the design was declared invalid, and the remaining ground was not examined.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberDimitrios ANDRIANOPOULOS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

11.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000120540

vs Henan Nanhua Qianmu Biotechnology Co., Ltd.

2023-06-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(a)118
000117713

vs Jessica Peil

2022-07-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(a)118
000130246

vs Giuliana FERRAROTTI

2026-05-15REUD invalidated116
000131904

vs Lang Huang

2026-04-20REUD invalidated116
000126958

vs Anna Krystyniak

2025-10-15REUD invalidated116
000126975

vs Anna Krystyniak

2025-10-15REUD invalidated116
000126957

vs Anna Krystyniak

2025-10-15REUD invalidated116
000126956

vs Anna Krystyniak

2025-10-15REUD invalidated116