DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008659163-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-06-15

000120383

Contested design: 008659163-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0086591630001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Iron Hodl GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Apprichstr. 12a, 86199 Augsburg, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Yongqing Tu

China (CN)

No. 3039, Baoan North Road, Luohu District, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China

Represented by

Brettschneider Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH

Jörg Brettschneider

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

BUTTERFLY bitcoin steel wallet

https://www.amazon.de/BUTTERFLY-US-bitcoin-steel-wallletdouble/dp/B08QV45ZQK/ref=sr_1_145_sspa · Amazon.de · disclosed 2021-02-09

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on an earlier Amazon-disclosed BUTTERFLY bitcoin steel wallet.
  • Holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listing as prior disclosure and found the compared cryptocurrency wallet designs created the same overall impression.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

14.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130850

vs Michael AMARA

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131224

vs Shenzhen Ruixin Fengshuo Electronic Co., Ltd

2026-03-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130970

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131064

vs Jinfeng Min

2026-02-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130524

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000129861

vs Liu yanqiong

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130564

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130565

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148