DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008537781-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-06-15

000120518

Contested design: 008537781-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0085377810001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

APV Trade Solution Ltdvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

7 Unit Castle Road, Sittingbourne ME10 3RZ, United Kingdom

Represented by

Briffa

Holder · RCD owner

Yadong Miaovia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No.026, Haojiajia Group, Main Street, Caojiagou Village, Babao Township, Lin County, Luliang City, Shanxi 033000, China

Represented by

CO LA Consulting

Michele Carella

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

smart weighted hula hoop

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nymP2NwHgM · YouTube / Worthbuystore · disclosed 2020-03-25

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested hoop lacked novelty and individual character over an earlier smart weighted hula hoop disclosed online before filing.
  • Applicant relied on YouTube stills, a Worthbuystore product page, and an enlarged image showing the earlier product; the holder filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted disclosure by 25/03/2020 and treated the Annex 4 image as part of the same earlier design shown in the video and website evidence.
  • Comparing the designs, the Division found only minor differences in colour, buckle shape, and width, insufficient to alter the overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberIneta GALUBICKE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218