DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008061774-0016

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-06-28

000120328

Contested design: 008061774-0016

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the proprietor is ordered to bear EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Declares registered Community design No 008061774-0016 to be invalid. 3. Orders the proprietor to bear the costs, which are fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Vidal Golosinas, S.A.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Avda. GUTIERREZ Mellado s/n, 30500 Molina de Segura (Murcia) Spain

Represented by

ars Privilegium, S.L.

Holder · RCD owner

Hitschler International GmbH Co. KGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

An der Hasenkaule 10, 50354 Hürth, Germany

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

green cylindrical sweet bar with slightly flattened ends and sugar on the surface

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFawbANs9qY · YouTube

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier disclosures of Hitschies sweets, including D1.
  • The proprietor filed no observations on the merits and separately argued only that representation costs should not be fixed at the maximum rate across parallel cases.
  • The Division found the internet and periodical evidence sufficient to prove disclosure of D1 before the filing date and treated sweets as a field with high designer freedom.
  • Because the contested design and D1 created the same overall impression on the informed user, the design lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberALVARO SOCMERINO
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

01.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000126695

vs IKOONA SP. Z O.O.

2025-10-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000127155

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000127156

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000127157

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000126116

vs IZVOR COMERCIAL INVEST SRL

2025-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000120413

vs Hristo Shiderov

2025-02-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000126097

vs EYADA GLOBAL SYSTEM GROUP

2024-10-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018