DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008061774-0012

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-06-28

000120362

Contested design: 008061774-0012

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the proprietor must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Declares registered Community design No 008061774-0012 to be invalid. Orders the proprietor to bear the costs, which are fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Vidal Golosinas, S.A.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Avda. GUTIERREZ Mellado s/n, 30500 Molina de Segura (Murcia) Spain

Represented by

ars Privilegium, S.L.

Holder · RCD owner

Hitschler International GmbH Co. KGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

An der Hasenkaule 10, 50354 Hürth, Germany

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

yellow cylindrical sweet bar with slightly flattened ends

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzHMRc7a8lk&list=RDLVMCFIbA13gCQ&index=6 · YouTube

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested sweets design lacked novelty and individual character in light of earlier public disclosures, including D1.
  • The proprietor filed no observations on invalidity, but separately argued the representation costs should not be fixed at the maximum amount across multiple parallel cases.
  • The Division found the earlier design D1 had been sufficiently disclosed before the filing date through online and other materials, including the cited YouTube evidence.
  • Given the high degree of design freedom for sweets and the near identity of the compared shapes, the contested design created the same overall impression and lacked individual character.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberALVARO SOCMERINO
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

01.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000126695

vs IKOONA SP. Z O.O.

2025-10-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000127155

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000127156

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000127157

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000126116

vs IZVOR COMERCIAL INVEST SRL

2025-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000120413

vs Hristo Shiderov

2025-02-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000126097

vs EYADA GLOBAL SYSTEM GROUP

2024-10-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018