DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008061774-0008

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-07-03

000120339

Contested design: 008061774-0008

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld and registered Community design No 008061774-0008 is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Declares registered Community design No 008061774-0008 to be invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Vidal Golosinas, S.A.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Avda. GUTIERREZ Mellado s/n, 30500 Molina de Segura (Murcia) Spain

Represented by

ars Privilegium, S.L.

Holder · RCD owner

Hitschler International GmbH Co. KGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

An der Hasenkaule 10, 50354 Hürth, Germany

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

green cylindrical sweet bar with slightly flattened ends

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzHMRc7a8lk&list=RDLVMCFIbA13gCQ&index=6 · YouTube

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier disclosures of the proprietor’s sweets, including D1 from a YouTube video.
  • The proprietor filed no observations on invalidity, but argued separately that representation costs should not be fixed at the maximum rate across nineteen parallel cases.
  • The Division found D1 had been sufficiently disclosed online before the filing date and that the informed user would receive the same overall impression from both sweets designs.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR, and the proprietor was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberALVARO SOCMERINO
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

01.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000126695

vs IKOONA SP. Z O.O.

2025-10-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000127155

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000127156

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000127157

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000126116

vs IZVOR COMERCIAL INVEST SRL

2025-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000120413

vs Hristo Shiderov

2025-02-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000126097

vs EYADA GLOBAL SYSTEM GROUP

2024-10-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018