DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009074354-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-07-03

000120876

Contested design: 009074354-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 009074354-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Xiamen Bandian Oringinality Technology CO., LTD.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

R.601, No.7 Fanghu Second West Road, Huli Dist., Xiamen 361006, China

Holder · RCD owner

Fanhui Zeng

China (CN)

No.170, Xinhua Road, Huazhou Street Office, Dengzhou, Henan 474150, China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Prior art cited (3)

National design

night light in the form of a toaster with a slice of bread

CN 307173792 S (application No 202130744441.3) · China · disclosed 2022-03-15

Web disclosure

Toast Night Light, LED Smile Bread Toast Night Lamp

https://www.amazon.de; ASIN B0B5N5SRCR · Amazon · disclosed 2022-07-02

Web disclosure

Sanmubo Cute Night Light Toast Lamp

https://www.amazon.de; ASIN B0B545FJ4R · Amazon · disclosed 2022-06-25

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested night-light design lacked novelty and individual character over earlier disclosures, especially a Chinese design showing an almost identical toaster-and-bread lamp.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not rebut the applicant's evidence or arguments on disclosure, grace period, or the comparison of the designs.
  • The Invalidity Division treated the Chinese design as disclosed before the filing date and found the designer's freedom at least average for night lights.
  • It held that the minor wording and underside differences did not change the overall impression on the informed user, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberIneta GALUBICKE
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268