DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008061774-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-07-05

000120359

Contested design: 008061774-0004

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 008061774-0004 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Vidal Golosinas, S.A.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Avda. Gutierrez Mellado s/n, 30500 Molina de Segura (Murcia) Spanien

Represented by

Ars Privilegium, S.L.

Holder · RCD owner

Hitschler International GmbH & Co. KGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

An der Hasenkaule 10, 50354 Hürth, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

cylindrical candy bar with slightly flattened ends

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzHMRc7a8lk&list=RDLVMCFIbA13gCQ&index=6 · YouTube

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier disclosed candy designs including D1.
  • The holder filed no observations on the merits and only argued that representative costs should not be fixed at the maximum amount across the parallel cases.
  • The Division found prior disclosure of D1 proven through the submitted magazine, social-media and video evidence, and treated designer freedom for sweets as high.
  • It held that the contested design created no different overall impression from D1, so the RCD lacked individual character and was declared invalid with costs against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

01.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000126695

vs IKOONA SP. Z O.O.

2025-10-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000127155

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000127156

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000127157

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000126116

vs IZVOR COMERCIAL INVEST SRL

2025-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000120413

vs Hristo Shiderov

2025-02-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000126098

vs EYADA GLOBAL SYSTEM GROUP

2024-10-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018