DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006309100-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-07-05

000120864

Contested design: 006309100-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, Registered Community design No 0063091000001 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0063091000001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Societe Bic, société anonymevia PDF extraction

France (FR)

12-22, Boulevard Victor Hugo, 92110 Clichy, France

Represented by

In Concreto

Holder · RCD owner

Hunan Zhuoye Electronic Company Limited

China (CN)

Industrial Park, JianghuaYaozu Autonomous County, Yongzhou City, Hunan, China

Represented by

Würth & Kollegen

Prior art cited (3)

PublicationAnnex 3

BIC lighter shown in a promotional brochure

BIC promotional brochure

CatalogAnnex 11

BIC lighter shown in 40th anniversary catalogues

BIC anniversary catalogue

Web disclosure

BIC lighter shown in five video snapshots

YouTube video "Tutorial: Magic trick with a lighter - Make the logo disappear - Magic explained" · YouTube · disclosed 2012-02-17

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested lighter design lacked novelty and individual character over its long-marketed BIC lighter disclosed through catalogues, a brochure, and a YouTube video before 14 March 2019.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the annexes and YouTube material as prior disclosure and found that, despite minor differences, the two lighters created the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR, and the holder was ordered to pay costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberIneta GALUBICKE
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

27.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130847

vs Ying CAO

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000125137

vs Shenzhen Olit Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-12-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000127919

vs Benxi Fenghe Lighter Co., Ltd

2025-05-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000124395

vs Xin Lu

2025-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000126756

vs SHENZHEN KAIWEILI DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2024-12-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000126655

vs Feoba Tech Limited

2024-12-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000126656

vs Feoba Tech Limited

2024-12-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000126597

vs Feoba Tech Limited

2024-12-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278