DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008687073-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-07-07

000120859

Contested design: 008687073-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder’s costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 008687073-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Akifix S.P.A.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Corso Italia, 27, 39100 Bolzano, Italy

Holder · RCD owner

Fercomacess, Lda.via PDF extraction

Portugal (PT)

Rua da Liberdade, n.º 135, 3750-791, Trofa, Portugal

Represented by

Miguel Alexandre de Oliveira Soares Fernandes

Prior art cited (1)

CatalogDocument 4⚠ rejected as evidence

Undated holder catalogue showing the contested anchoring device for suspended ceilings as an alleged prior self-disclosure.

Fercomacess catalogue

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 4(2)Article 4(3)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity under Articles 25(1)(b), 4(1), 4(2)-(3) and 8(1), arguing the anchoring device had been marketed earlier by the holder, was purely functional, and was not visible in normal use.
  • Holder filed observations late and not in the language of proceedings, so the Division did not take them into account.
  • The Division found the applicant had not shown the design was a component part of a complex product, had not proved its essential features were solely technically dictated, and had not established an earlier public disclosure.
  • The application was rejected as unfounded and the applicant was ordered to pay EUR 400 in representation costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)257
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)257
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)257
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)257
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)257
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)257
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)257
000124780

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)257