DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009191927-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-07-11

000120202

Contested design: 009191927-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0091919270002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Aff Commerce Sp. z o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Rajec Poduchowny 95A, 26613 Rajec Poduchowny, Poland

Represented by

Maciej Marian Priebe

Holder · RCD owner

Martomvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Piaskowa 10, 66-008 Świdnica, Poland

Represented by

Anna Giercarz

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Ruyilam Solar Lights Outdoor Garden solar lamp design offered on Amazon

ASIN B08 C51 XWVG · www.amazon.co.uk · disclosed 2020-07-01

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicants sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on an earlier Amazon disclosure of a similar solar light before the filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not rebut the applicants' evidence or contest disclosure, designer freedom, or the design comparison.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted the Amazon listing as prior public disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and assessed individual character first for procedural economy.
  • It found the designs produced the same overall impression on the informed user, so the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR.
  • The application was upheld in full, the design was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to bear the fixed costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268