DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004394732-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-07-19

000117937

Contested design: 004394732-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 004394732-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Polstal W. Dudek Spolka z ograniczona odpowiedzialnosciavia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Kolejowa 45 lok. F129, 01-210 Warszawa, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Bratex Dachy Mrzygłód Spółka Komandytowavia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Przemysłowa 22, 39-200 Dębica, Poland

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

roof coverings

RCD No 003060375-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2016-04-08

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier RCD No 003060375-0001 and related market disclosures for roofing tiles.
  • The holder argued the compared tiles differed in mounting holes, side notches, fold geometry, and segment shapes, and disputed whether the earlier design was validly disclosed in time.
  • The Division held publication of the earlier RCD in the Community Designs Bulletin proved disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and rejected the holder's objection.
  • Given broad designer freedom for sheet roofing tiles, the common arrangement and overall shape outweighed the differences, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124780

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258