DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008848766-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-07-21

000119698

Contested design: 008848766-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder’s fixed costs of EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 008848766-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Ridgewood Global Limitedvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

8 Rodborough Road, London NW11 8RY United Kingdom

Holder · RCD owner

UAB Orbio world

LT

K. Donelaičio g. 60, 44248 Kaunas, Lithuania

Represented by

Rytis Rudzinskas

Prior art cited (3)

Web disclosureD1

knife listing on Amazon

https://www.amazon.com/Japanese-Butcher-Cleaver-Kitrchen-Caveman/dp/B08NB2867V?th͇͇͇=1 · Amazon.com · disclosed 2020-11-12

Web disclosureD2

knife listing on Amazon

https://www.amazon.de/dp/B08L4PMZ7Q · Amazon.de · disclosed 2020-01-14

Web disclosureD3

knife listing on Amazon

https://www.amazon.fr/dp/B08ND246BJ · Amazon.fr · disclosed 2020-11-12

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on three earlier Amazon knife listings disclosed before the filing date.
  • The holder argued the knife sector was crowded and the contested design differed in the handle, blade spine, notches, heel, handle lines, and bolster.
  • The Division accepted D1 to D3 as prior web disclosures but found the designer had at least average freedom and the visual differences created a different overall impression.
  • The invalidity grounds under Articles 6 and 5 failed, so the application was rejected and costs were awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130884

vs Yigen Yang

2026-04-02Art 25(1)(b)087
000130703

vs Biwei Lin

2026-03-23Art 25(1)(b)087
000129381

vs EQUIPMOTOR LOCOMOTION DIRECT

2026-02-23Art 25(1)(b)087
000130727

vs Qiang Qian

2026-01-27Art 25(1)(b)087
000130282

vs Xiaodong SHAO

2025-12-19Art 25(1)(b)087
000114141

vs M&T 1997,a.s.

2025-12-15Art 25(1)(b)087
000126676

vs GH Holding Bjerre ApS

2025-09-10Art 25(1)(b)087
000125985

vs Best on Bolt GmbH

2025-05-28Art 25(1)(b)087