DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015002817-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-08-02

000121378

Contested design: 015002817-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 015002817-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen Dongwang E-commerce Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

A3051, Wanzhongcheng Garment Wholesale Market, Xinniu Community, Minzhi Street, Longhua District, Shenzhen 518110, China

Represented by

Krzysztof Breguła

Holder · RCD owner

Oderra Products Limited

Hong Kong (HK)

No.A222, 3F, Hang Fung Industrial Building, Phase 2, No.2G Hok Yuen Street, Hunghom, Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China

Represented by

Berk Gokhan

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnex 1

Amazon.de product listing for 'Jokooan Montessori Toy for Babies' showing the prior baby activity toy design

Amazon.de ASIN B0B7HFVS2W · Amazon.de · disclosed 2022-01-10

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested baby activity toy lacked novelty and individual character because an almost identical design had been disclosed earlier on Amazon.de.
  • The applicant relied on Annex 1, including an Amazon.de printout and related images for ASIN B0B7HFVS2W dated 10 January 2022.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Invalidity Division found the Amazon disclosure proven under Article 7 and held that the contested design created the same overall impression as the prior design.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was invalidated for lack of individual character, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218