DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008887293-0005

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-08-04

000120405

Contested design: 008887293-0005

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld, the contested Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 008887293-0005 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Twin Busch GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Amperestr. 1, 64625 Bensheim, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

Unicarat GmbH

Germany (DE)

Gartenkampsweg 7, 40822 Mettmann, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

lamp with three staggered rows of five honeycomb cells within a rectangular frame

www.zonengled.com via Wayback Machine; YouTube videos · disclosed 2018-11-30

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier disclosed lamp designs, particularly D1.
  • The holder disputed proof of disclosure and argued that the contested design was new and had individual character.
  • The Division found D1 sufficiently disclosed before the filing date through archived webpages and YouTube materials known to the relevant sector.
  • Comparing the lamp designs, the Division held that their overall impressions did not differ, given the shared honeycomb layout and rectangular frame.
  • The invalidity application was upheld in full; the contested design was declared invalid and the holder was ordered to pay costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268