DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002341909-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-10-03

000119259

Contested design: 002341909-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Se estima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad. 2. Se declara nulo el dibujo o modelo comunitario registrado n.º 002341909-0003. 3. Se condena al titular a que sufrague las costas del solicitante, que se fijan en 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Laboratoires Filorga Cosmetiques société par actions simplifiée à associé uniquevia PDF extraction

France (FR)

2-4 rue de Lisbonne, 75008 Paris, Francia

Represented by

Elzaburu, S.L.P.

Holder · RCD owner

Plásticos Faca, S.A.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Ctra. del Mig, 1-13, 08940 Cornellà de Llobregat (Barcelona), España

Prior art cited (2)

Publication

ISO-AGE cosmetic jar shown in applicant brochure and press coverage

France Soir, 26/01/2010 · France Soir · disclosed 2010-01-26

Publication

Cosmetic cream jar shown in Santé magazine extract

Santé magazine, agosto 2013 · Santé magazine

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested cosmetic jar lacked novelty and individual character because the same main features were already disclosed in earlier brochure and magazine publications.
  • The holder disputed admissibility and disclosure, challenged the quality, source, date, EU accessibility, and grace-period relevance of the prior art, and maintained that the contested design had distinctive visual features.
  • The Invalidity Division found the prior disclosures sufficiently proven and accessible, rejected the grace-period objection for lack of proof, and considered the designer's freedom not particularly limited.
  • Comparing the registered design with the earlier jar disclosures, the Division held that the differences, including colour and omitted verbal elements or lid features, did not change the overall impression, so the design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131632

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000129741

vs 2W ORGANIC

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131788

vs Liu Xiaoxia

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131628

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131704

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131745

vs Huan Wang

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000130924

vs SOHAI HOUSEWARES CO.,LTD.

2026-04-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131546

vs Foshan Changyuansheng Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078