DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009048945-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-10-03

000121439

Contested design: 009048945-0004

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 009048945-0004 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Androni Giocattoli S.R.L.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Stazione, 110, 28040 Varallo Pombia (NO), Italy

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Bangduola Electronic Technology Trading Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Room 501, No. 15, No. 13-24, Back Street, Wansheng Department Store, Xiangjiaotang Community, Bantian Street, Longgang District, Shenzhen 518000, China

Represented by

Qiang Zhou

Prior art cited (1)

CatalogAnnex D3

catalog disclosure of toy watering cans and buckets relied on as the prior design set

Simba Collection 2019; items No 10 710 1668 12/120 and No 10 710 3715 12/48 · Simba Collection 2019 catalogue

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested toy set lacked individual character over earlier bucket and watering-can designs disclosed in the 2019 Simba catalogue.
  • The holder, although invited, filed no observations and did not dispute the alleged prior disclosure.
  • The Division accepted disclosure via the dated catalogue, treated the earlier bucket and watering can together given the nature of the contested set, and found broad designer freedom.
  • Despite some detail and colour differences, the designs created the same overall impression on the informed user, so invalidity under Article 25(1)(b) and Article 6(1)(b) was established.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberIneta GALUBICKE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218