DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008318984-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-10-29

000121485

Contested design: 008318984-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008318984-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Mina Wangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 56, Chunhui Road, Runhe Chenyuan, Yancang, Chang'an Town, Haining City, Jiaxing City, Zhejiang Province, China

Represented by

Tom Palmisano

Holder · RCD owner

Yiwu ThousandShores E-Commerce Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

9th Floor, Building No.3, YiWu International E-Commerce Town, 315 HongYun Road, ChengXi Street, YiWu City, ZheJiang Province 315, China

Represented by

Joanna Dargiewicz

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Ace Punch 8 Pieces Colour Combination Pyramid Acoustic Foam Sound Insulation Tiles acoustic plates

https://www.amazon.de; ASIN B 06X 93L K5B · Amazon.de · disclosed 2017-02-16

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested acoustic foam panel lacked novelty and individual character in light of earlier Amazon-disclosed foam boards with the same overall impression.
  • The holder filed no observations and left the invalidity application undefended.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listing as sufficient internet disclosure before 11 December 2020 under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • It found that minor differences in the number of pyramids did not alter the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)257
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)257
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)257
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)257
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)257
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)257
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)257
000124780

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)257