DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008533079-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-10-31

000121402

Contested design: 008533079-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008533079-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Lego Juris A/Svia PDF extraction

Denmark (DK)

Koldingvej 2, 7190 Billund, Denmark

Represented by

Bomhard IP, S.L.

Holder · RCD owner

Peiquan Caivia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 16, Paigouqian Road, Xiacun Village, Lianxia Town, Chenghai District, Shantou City, Guangdong Province, China

Represented by

Qiang Zhou

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureA

Screenshots of an offer for set 75964 'Harry Potter Advent Calendar' including the toy figure 'Harry Potter - Dark Blue, HP206'

https://brickset.com · brickset.com · disclosed 2019-11-30

Web disclosureB

Article 'LEGO Christmas Advent Calendars 2019: December 1' showing the same toy figure design

https://www.brickfanatics.com · Brick Fanatics · disclosed 2019-12-01

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested toy-figure design lacked individual character compared with earlier LEGO figurines disclosed online before the filing date.
  • The applicant also invoked EUTM-based confusion and dilution, but the Division did not need to assess that alternative ground.
  • The holder filed no observations, so the Division assessed disclosure and individual character on the documentary record alone.
  • The Division found the prior figurine was publicly disclosed in 2019 and that the contested design's similarities outweighed minor differences, so invalidity was granted.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218