DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008803266-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-11-13

000120078

Contested design: 008803266-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld and Registered Community design No 008803266-0001 is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008803266-0001 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Lettino sp. z o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Grzybno 66, 87327 Bobrowo, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Kamila Kowalczyk

Poland (PL)

Budapesztańska 15/8, 80288 Gdańsk, Poland

Represented by

Katarzyna Binder-Sony

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Zakład Stolarski 'Piętrus' 'Kacper cot colour 120x60 with drawer Ref.: ŁD.KC.SZ.KO'

https://pietrus.pl · Internet Archive capture of pietrus.pl · disclosed 2020-09-18

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested baby cot lacked novelty and individual character over the earlier 'Kacper cot' disclosed online and sold before the filing date.
  • The holder argued that safety standards significantly constrained designer freedom and that differences in drawer openings, top-edge curvature, and rail shape created a different overall impression.
  • The Division accepted the Internet Archive and sales documents as proof of prior disclosure and found designer freedom at least average despite regulatory constraints for cots.
  • It held the differences marginal, found the same overall impression on the informed user, upheld invalidity under Article 25(1)(b) and Article 6(1)(b), and ordered costs against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068