DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008668859-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-11-15

000120387

Contested design: 008668859-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity against Registered Community design No. 008668859-0001 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusters Nr. 008668859-0001 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Der Antragsteller trägt die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Herbert Koernervia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Sewanstr. 251, 10319 Berlin, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

mySheepi GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Alt-Moabit 92, 10559 Berlin, Deutschland

Represented by

Hans-Peter Gottfried

Prior art cited (5)

Trade mark

older trademark right allegedly held by Lars Reimann

Utility model

sleep pillow variant

DE 20 2021 000 859 U1 · Germany

Patent

medical travel and rest pillow with external pillow cover, variable for cervical and lumbar spine area

European Patent No. 245971 · European patent

Publication

instructions for use for a sleep pillow variant from 2015

Other

invoice extract

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(f)Article 25(3)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued that the contested pillow design unlawfully used his earlier protected work and cited an older trademark, a German utility model, a European patent, a manual and an invoice.
  • Holder replied that the mark was not used, the patent did not match the design, and copyright ownership, prior disclosure and originality were not proven.
  • The Division held that Article 25(1)(f) requires proof of the relevant national copyright law, ownership of the earlier right and the conditions for protection.
  • Because the applicant identified no member state or applicable copyright provisions and did not substantiate the right invoked, the invalidity application was rejected and costs were awarded against him.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.09

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000120458

vs NightDreamer GmbH

2023-11-17Art 25(1)(f)067
000128557

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19065
000128656

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19065
000129371

vs joboo GmbH

2026-05-05065
000128978

vs Franco Ferri S.R.L.

2026-04-13065
000131627

vs Shuifa XIE

2026-03-31065
000130974

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10065
000128937

vs Liyou Industrial Co., Ltd

2026-02-24065