DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007116611-0006

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-11-21

000121934

Contested design: 007116611-0006

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 007116611-0006 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Keter Home and Garden Products Ltd.via PDF extraction

IL

1 Sapir Street, 14th Floor Industrial Zone, 4685205 Herzliya, Israel

Holder · RCD owner

Taizhou Sukk Furniture Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No.8 Jinchuan Road, Huangyan, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China

Represented by

H&A

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCDAnnex 1

outdoor dining table

Community design registration No 003457654-0007 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2016-11-29

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the outdoor rattan table lacked novelty and individual character over its earlier RCD No 003457654-0007, published in 2016, and also alleged bad faith.
  • Holder filed no observations and left the invalidity application undefended.
  • The Division treated the bad-faith allegation as inadmissible, accepted publication of the earlier RCD as sufficient disclosure, and found broad designer freedom for outdoor dining tables.
  • Because the shared shape, leg placement, rattan-style surfaces and under-table walls outweighed minor border, pattern and shade differences, the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068