DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002452904-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-11-27

000119920

Contested design: 002452904-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder’s fixed costs of EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of Registered Community design No 002452904-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Rodon International BVvia PDF extraction

Netherlands (NL)

Weeresteinstraat 138, 2181GD Hillegom, Netherlands

Represented by

Lambert Heinrich Eduard Drenthe, Aranka Ivonne Keur

Holder · RCD owner

Meyn Beheer B.V.

Netherlands (NL)

Westeinde 6, 1511 MA Oostzaan, Netherlands

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

Meyn's earlier line weigher / weighing shackle

'New Line weigher for sorting lines' · Poultry World weblog · disclosed 2011-11-08

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(2)Article 8(1)Article 8(2)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for no novelty or individual character and under Articles 4(2), 8(1) and 8(2), relying mainly on a 2011 Poultry World web article and images of Meyn’s earlier line weigher.
  • Holder argued the cited earlier shackle was materially different in dimensions, contours and overall impression, was not solely functional or must-fit, and the contested design was not a component part of a complex product.
  • The Division rejected the late Facebook video, found no proof for the Article 4(2), 8(1) or 8(2) objections, and held the web image too unclear to establish prior disclosure for novelty or individual character.
  • The application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay the holder’s fixed costs of EUR 400.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

10.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000120882

vs ELECTRONIC CONTROLS COMPANY

2023-11-17Art 25(1)(b)107
000120881

vs ELECTRONIC CONTROLS COMPANY

2023-11-17Art 25(1)(b)107
000130127

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)105
000130161

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)105
000125988

vs ALEKSANDRA MACIĄGOWSKA - FLEXISTYLE

2025-07-11Art 25(1)(b)105
000125316

vs ENGO CONTROLS SPÓŁKA Z OGRANICZONĄ ODPOWIEDZIALNOŚCIĄ, SPÓŁKA KOMANDYTOWA

2025-06-16Art 25(1)(b)105
000127515

vs Changzhou Fengxue Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-06-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)105
0001274582025-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)105