DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015042284-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-01-07

000130161

Contested design: 015042284-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; Registered EU design No 0150422840001 is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 720 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 0150422840001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Gromtor Sp. z o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Wroclaw, Poland

Represented by

Anna Rokicka

Holder · RCD owner

Albor Bogdan Niedbałavia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Murowana Goślina, Poland

Represented by

Aleksandra Konklewska

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureAnnex 1.2

holder's OG1 lightning conductor shown on the holder's website

www.odgrom.pl (archived via https://www.web.archive.org) · Internet Archive / www.odgrom.pl · disclosed 2017-10-31

Web disclosureAnnex 1.4

offer for the holder's OG1 lightning conductor on allegro.pl

https://allegro.pl · allegro.pl · disclosed 2022-07-14

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested lightning conductor design lacked novelty because the identical OG1 product had been disclosed on the holder's website in 2017 and on allegro.pl by 2022.
  • The holder filed no observations despite being invited to respond, so the invalidity application was undefended.
  • The Division accepted the website and marketplace evidence as public disclosure before filing and found no perceptible differences between the prior and contested designs.
  • The application was upheld for lack of novelty under Article 25(1)(b) and Article 5 EUDR, and the holder was ordered to bear costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENÉ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

10.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130127

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000127515

vs Changzhou Fengxue Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-06-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
0001274582025-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123374

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123375

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123394

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123355

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123378

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108